Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 05:41:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 05:41:00 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com ([207.175.42.156]:30470 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 05:40:44 -0400 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200010280940.e9S9eSx02362@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions To: kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 05:40:28 -0400 (EDT) Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse), vojtech@suse.cz (Vojtech Pavlik), alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <5122.972699496@ocs3.ocs-net> from "Keith Owens" at Oct 28, 2000 01:18:16 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > cc list trimmed. Nobody has come up with a "must have" reason for > get_module_symbol and that interface is broken as designed. I will be Nobody has come up with a 'must break existing sane code' reason either. > will allow two objects to pass data to each other, it will not matter > whether the objects are both modules, one module and one built in (in > either order) or both built in. When modules are involved there will > be full module locking. You have no consensus on this. None at all. It is also past the 2.4test point for making this change. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/