Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 13:17:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 13:17:30 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:26836 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 13:17:29 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 10:17:28 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Keith Owens Cc: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available Message-ID: <20020406101728.G6087@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Keith Owens , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <7022.1018005968@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <12641.1018058595@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 12:03:15PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > Just to avoid any confusion. kbuild 2.4 is the existing kernel build > system, as used in Marcelo's and Linus's kernels. kbuild 2.5 is the > complete rewrite of the kernel build system. So that means that you have a system which does more, is more accurate, and is faster than the system we currently use. Right? Rock on. Has anyone integrated the kbuild stuff into a BK tree, so I could pull from it and play with it? If not, I might have a go at it and make a bk://kbuild.bkbits.net project. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/