Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 13:31:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 13:31:36 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:45580 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 13:31:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 12:31:32 -0600 To: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available Message-ID: <20020406183132.GF13991@cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <6529.1018004347@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <20020405110913.GA11374@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020405132324.L4640@csr-pc6.local> <20020405182504.GN961@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Sebastian Heidl] > > It's signed. Just pipe it through gpg with Keiths public key. [Mike Fedyk] > Signed means that there is a checksum at the bottom that you can > verify with gpg/pgp to see if the message was tampered with, but the > text itself it still in ascii and not encoded. Not that it matters (he did send out a reprint) but the message *was* merely signed. The base64-looking encoding is merely a way to make sure that MTAs and other software don't screw with tabs, line breaks, etc., which would make the signature look invalid. > This looks encrypted to me. It doesn't look encrypted to gpg. Pipe the message to it, you'll see. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/