Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751524AbZLNFj2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:39:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751349AbZLNFj0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:39:26 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com ([209.85.220.213]:52351 "EHLO mail-fx0-f213.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751332AbZLNFjZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:39:25 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eoWU63nD2YsIERoZx2F3sW+1VaxP85lk/HOFwOjV5r4q7CCMwPDJw5zLPCY6w2EfnP w2RLstFQIDzwTFTi8At5Wp1q+HJccvTQ+AlYqff97tkIaDZHmRS9z9lbIX/203/4gG0M auq2u3RtSUweMBtQA0lA9LDHMok/vRu8k6AAQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <9b2db90b0912122323w25d2d815o70d0bd2f1e19a228@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:39:23 +0200 Message-ID: <9b2db90b0912132139m702db437x64a70a98c16667b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: nconfig v7 From: Nir Tzachar To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1999 Lines: 48 >>10x ;) > > Ten times what? Thanks... >>> - provide the same color scheme as menuconfig >> >>As far as colrs are involved, I think it is best to not impose any >>color scheme. You can never satisfy everyone, and will get into >>endless fights about which is best. > > Well, menuconfig seems to have had the least fights. There was exactly > one color scheme imposed, and that did not change for years; when themes > were added, not much happened. There was a bit of discussion and > submissions about themes (including myself), but in the end, it was > sort-of agreed upon that four were enough. And they seem to work for > everybody. > >>I believe the current approach in nconfig works best, as I am using >>the default terminal colors for the main body of text (menus, help >>text, etc), and only use colors for emphasis (headings, boxes, etc). > > No sorry. Black-on-blue does not work very much, for the physical fact > that blue is recognized as faint. Let me put in some numbers (30,59,11% > are the common RGB weighting for grayscale/luminance) > > ?Blue: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Effective Lum: > ?- xterm standard (#0000EE): 26.18 > ?- VGA standard (#0000AA): ? 18.70 > ?Cyan: > ?- VGA (#00AAAA) ? ? ? ? ? ? 119.00 > > So you see why Midnight Commander, htop, etc. all use Black-on-Cyan for > their Fn keybar instead of Blue. I'll go along with you, but only as fat as the highlights are concerned. I will oppose any kind of color theme for the main body of text, as it will just lead to arguments about readability, etc., which I feel no one would win but the loudest complainer. Again, I believe it is best to make use as much as possible of the colors the user has picked for her terminal, as she had already made the best choice for _her_. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/