Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752623AbZLNF7N (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:59:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752253AbZLNF7M (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:59:12 -0500 Received: from james.oetiker.ch ([213.144.138.195]:36891 "EHLO james.oetiker.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752198AbZLNF7L (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:59:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:59:08 +0100 (CET) From: Tobias Oetiker To: Corrado Zoccolo cc: Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , Frans Pop , Jiri Kosina , Sven Geggus , Karol Lewandowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Pekka Enberg , Rik van Riel , Christoph Lameter , Stephan von Krawczynski , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kernel Testers List Subject: Re: still getting allocation failures (was Re: [PATCH] vmscan: Stop kswapd waiting on congestion when the min watermark is not being met V2) In-Reply-To: <4e5e476b0912031226i5b0e6cf9hdfd5519182ccdefa@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20091113142608.33B9.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091113135443.GF29804@csn.ul.ie> <20091114023138.3DA5.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091113181557.GM29804@csn.ul.ie> <2f11576a0911131033w4a9e6042k3349f0be290a167e@mail.gmail.com> <20091113200357.GO29804@csn.ul.ie> <20091202113241.GC1457@csn.ul.ie> <4e5e476b0912031226i5b0e6cf9hdfd5519182ccdefa@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1110 Lines: 30 Hi Corrado, Dec 3 Corrado Zoccolo wrote: > Hi Tobias, > does the patch in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/30/301 help with your > high order allocation problems? > It seems that you have lot of memory, but high order pages do not show up. > The patch should make them more likely to appear. > On my machine (that has much less ram than yours), with the patch, I > always have order-10 pages available. I have tried it and ... it does not work, the page allocation failure still shows. BUT while testing it on two machines I found that it only shows on on machine. The workload on the two machines is similar (they both run virtualbox) and also the available memory. Could it be caused by a hardware driver ? cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi@oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/