Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:50:19 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BFS v0.311 CPU scheduler for 2.6.32
In-Reply-To: <200912121710.44216.kernel@kolivas.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0912140848160.20953@router.home>
References: <200912111124.18118.kernel@kolivas.org> <200912121300.54803.kernel@kolivas.org> <20091212055459.GC32739@1wt.eu> <200912121710.44216.kernel@kolivas.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 815
Lines: 17

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Con Kolivas wrote:

> That's the first meaningful reason I've heard for it. I may have to consider
> it now. It still would be compile time limited so probably not quite what
> you're hoping for. I don't have the time and energy to do and maintain the
> whole plugsched crap for boottime selection all over again, and that adds
> overhead which goes against one of my prime objectives.

There was no such suggestion. It would help you a lot if you would be less
uptight about things. If you are near Chicago: Want to get together for
a beer or so?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/