Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760044AbZLOLwK (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:52:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757677AbZLOLwI (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:52:08 -0500 Received: from sh.osrg.net ([192.16.179.4]:42069 "EHLO sh.osrg.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753519AbZLOLwD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:52:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:50:53 +0900 To: yinghai@kernel.org Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, mingo@elte.hu, rdreier@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem" From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: <4B277235.4010308@kernel.org> References: <20091215105650.GA13214@elte.hu> <20091215201039V.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4B277235.4010308@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20091215205034Y.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (sh.osrg.net [192.16.179.4]); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:50:53 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1573 Lines: 40 On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:25:41 -0800 Yinghai Lu wrote: > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:56:50 +0100 > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >> * FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > >> > >>> There are a few people who hit this. How many people use a box with over > >>> 256GB memory? > >>> > >>> And you can work around this with "dma32_size" kernel boot option. > >> Well, since the kernel has not crashed before this change there's really just > >> two options as per upstream kernel regression policy: either we fix it or we > >> revert it. > > > > As I wrote, here is a patch that can be applied to cleanly to the git > > head: > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/misc/0001-x86-two-stage-swiotlb-initialization.patch > > > > It fixes the problem. Yinghai, can you test it? It should work but > > it's good to confirm it. > > i tested already, it works. Great, thanks a lot! I've just sent the patch. > > I simply wanted to say that it's not a bug that breaks lots of boxes > > or leads to something serious like data corruption (no need to say > > something like "revert it now!"). It's also worth investigating why it > > breaks, I think. > > will look at it later Thanks. If it's due to huge memory, I try to work on it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/