Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 12:06:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 12:06:41 -0400 Received: from Expansa.sns.it ([192.167.206.189]:18699 "EHLO Expansa.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 12:06:41 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 18:06:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Luigi Genoni To: Martin Eriksson cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Best 2.4 kernel for SPARC? In-Reply-To: <000701c1dcf8$6d5b61b0$0201a8c0@homer> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am using 2.4.18 without problems on ultra2, ultra5 ultra10 E280 E420, so I tested both mono CPU and SMP (till 4 CPUs) systems. on the ultra2 SMP I tested also the peemptive kernel patch. So I think you can be quite sure with latest 2.4 kernels. Another thing is 2.5 kernels, I was not able to use many of them on sparc. Luigi On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Martin Eriksson wrote: > What is the 2.4 kernel that works best for SPARC? > > The machine is a SPARC Ultra 10 3D creator with RedHat 6.2, now running some > old 2.4 kernel (cannot check right now). > > I would also like to test some low-latency stuff if possible, and it is very > important that rebooting/powering off works 100% as it's an remote machine. > > /Martin > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/