Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 13:48:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 13:48:56 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:47286 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 13:48:55 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 13:48:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 In-Reply-To: <200204071727.g37HRet17641@fenrus.demon.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 arjan@fenrus.demon.nl wrote: > In article you wrote: > > This wants fixing in 2.5 too - basically > > > > static int (*afs_syscall)(...); > > sys_afs_syscall(...) > > { > > if(afs_syscall) > > return afs_syscall(....) > > return -ENOSYS; > > } > > I think it wants addin a lock around it vs module unload.... I suspect that equivalent of sys_nfsservctl() would be a better way, actually... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/