Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761038AbZLOT6N (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:58:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760956AbZLOT6G (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:58:06 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:54591 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761027AbZLOT6D (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:58:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4B27E9FD.5080306@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:56:45 -0800 From: Yinghai Lu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe CC: Jesse Barnes , Linux Kernel , mingo@elte.hu, rdreier@cisco.com, Suresh Siddha , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: kexec boot regression References: <20091215115052.GA28252@kernel.dk> <4B277AB2.8030107@kernel.org> <20091215121436.GB28252@kernel.dk> <4B2781AC.8020301@kernel.org> <20091215123951.GD28252@kernel.dk> <4B278734.2040704@kernel.org> <20091215141105.GK28252@kernel.dk> <4B27D7E9.4030105@kernel.org> <20091215194319.GT28252@kernel.dk> <4B27E817.6030705@kernel.org> <20091215195111.GV28252@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <20091215195111.GV28252@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1139 Lines: 31 Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix >>>> >>>> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it >>> This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the >>> mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue? >>> SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work. >> that patch will be bullet proof... we need it. >> >> also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly. >> >> do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in >> second kernel? > > Yes, 2.6.32 booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT > complaints and NUMA works fine. > how about current kernel booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT complaints and NUMA works fine. ? YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/