Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:33:01 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
       Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
       Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>,
       hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@arcor.de>,
       Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@bartelmus.de>, awalls@radix.net, j@jannau.net,
       jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, kraxel@redhat.com,
       linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-media@vger.kernel.org, superm1@ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel
 IR system?
Message-ID: <20091215203300.GL24406@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <9e4733910912060952h4aad49dake8e8486acb6566bc@mail.gmail.com>
 <m3skbn6dv1.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
 <20091207184153.GD998@core.coreip.homeip.net>
 <4B24DABA.9040007@redhat.com>
 <20091215115011.GB1385@ucw.cz>
 <4B279017.3080303@redhat.com>
 <20091215195859.GI24406@elf.ucw.cz>
 <9e4733910912151214n68161fc7tca0ffbf34c2c4e4@mail.gmail.com>
 <20091215201933.GK24406@elf.ucw.cz>
 <9e4733910912151229o371ee017tf3640d8f85728011@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910912151229o371ee017tf3640d8f85728011@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2080
Lines: 50

On Tue 2009-12-15 15:29:51, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > On Tue 2009-12-15 15:14:02, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> >> ? ? ? (11) if none is against renaming IR as RC, I'll do it on a next patch;
> >> >
> >> > Call it irc -- infrared remote control. Bluetooth remote controls will
> >> > have very different characteristics.
> >>
> >> How are they different after the scancode is extracted from the
> >> network packet? The scancode still needs to be passed to the input
> >> system, go through a keymap, and end up on an evdev device.
> >>
> >> I would expect the code for extracting the scancode to live in the
> >> networking stack, but after it is recovered the networking code would
> >> use the same API as IR to submit it to input.
> >
> > For one thing, ?bluetooth (etc) has concept of devices (and reliable
> > transfer). If you have two same bluetooth remotes, you can tell them
> > apart, unlike IR.
> 
> IR has the same concept of devices. That's what those codes you enter
> into a universal remote do - they set the device.

They set the device _model_.

> There are three classes of remotes..
> Fixed function - the device is hardwired
> Universal - you can change the device
> Multi-function - a universal that can be multiple devices - TV, cable,
> audio, etc
> 
> If you set two Bluetooth remotes both to the same device you can't
> tell them apart either.

Untrue. Like ethernets and wifis, bluetooth devices have unique
addresses. Communication is bidirectional.

Imagine wifi connected bluetooth. It is very different from infrared.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/