Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:37:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:37:22 -0400 Received: from smtprelay7.dc2.adelphia.net ([64.8.50.39]:16832 "EHLO smtprelay7.dc2.adelphia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:37:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:44:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steven N. Hirsch" X-X-Sender: hirsch@atx.fast.net To: Alan Cox cc: John Levon , "Steven N. Hirsch" , Subject: Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > But what about the recent discussion on the removal of sys_call_table ? > > > > (I believe it was along the lines of "it's ugly, prevent it ...", "ah, > > but it has real uses, so why can't it stay as deprecated/unadvised ?" > > "*no response*"). > > > > I'm a bit disappointed this has just gone in without any real discussion > > on the usefulness of this for certain circumstances :( > > Removing it in the -ac tree is a good way to stimulate discussion and > fixing the code that relies on it (except for the 99% of code relying on it > which is cracker authored trojans) I agree. I've forwarded the information to the openafs folks. Given Derek and Derrick's respective levels of energy, it's likely already fixed in the CVS tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/