Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 16:17:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 16:17:40 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:31036 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 16:17:38 -0400 To: John Levon Cc: Alan Cox , "Steven N. Hirsch" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 In-Reply-To: <20020407173343.GA18940@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <20020407194114.GA21800@compsoc.man.ac.uk> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 07 Apr 2002 14:10:42 -0600 Message-ID: Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org John Levon writes: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:49:17PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Removing it in the -ac tree is a good way to stimulate discussion > > OK > > > fixing the code that relies on it (except for the 99% of code relying on it > > which is cracker authored trojans) > > No doubt, but it's not much harder to look at nm vmlinux or System.map, > so I don't see the security angle... > > I'd be happy to bear the brunt of users moaning at me because they now > have to apply a kernel patch (and I have to maintain it ...), iff there > was some strongly technical reason the code has to change. Deep technical reason there are architectures where patching the system call table does not work. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/