Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757838AbZLPVaa (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:30:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757696AbZLPVa2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:30:28 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-152.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.32]:54097 "HELO outbound-mail-152.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757047AbZLPVa1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:30:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=hcz5OF6+J2UWKcE6EqtzUHIh2mhYwkalN+por6X3733FHnt4BtXtF8OIob4htl9YfFEw/2AGdLi8gjeU1aA/FyyhFsZOSath1jt1q18jrkTa1u1Xr2J2YFju6Qfw2SHF; Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:30:05 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Dave Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Adam Jackson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, keithp@keithp.com, eric@anholt.net, Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [BISECTED] drm: random hang since 620f378 "drm: prune modes when ..." Message-ID: <20091216133005.0e822950@jbarnes-piketon> In-Reply-To: <200912162120.34163.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200912071830.14697.arnd@arndb.de> <200912161453.12100.arnd@arndb.de> <20091216121823.08b5f0a6@jbarnes-piketon> <200912162120.34163.arnd@arndb.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.18.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1341 Lines: 32 On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:20:34 +0000 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 16 December 2009 20:18:23 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:53:11 +0100 > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > It's working fine so far, no more crashes, but I supposed this > > > effectively disables the power saving on my card again, right? > > > > The patch just disables one (probably ineffective) power saving > > feature. So if things are working well for you with it I'll queue > > up a revert patch. I'm working on a better version of dynamic > > clock control anyway. > > It just crashed again after a few hours of uptime with some unrelated > reboots in-between, with your patch applied. > > The symptom was slightly different, now the whole screen was filled > with random patterns, not just parts of the screen. Aside from that, > it was just the same complete lockup as without the patch. Possibly > less frequent, but that's hard to tell after a single sample. But you're sure powersave=0 was solid? Hmm... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/