Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 04:46:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 04:46:28 -0400 Received: from fungus.teststation.com ([212.32.186.211]:3337 "EHLO fungus.teststation.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 04:46:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:46:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Urban Widmark X-X-Sender: To: "James H. Cloos Jr." cc: Keith Owens , Subject: Re: [patch] Re: 2.4.19-pre6 dead Makefile entries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7 Apr 2002, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote: > >> fs/nls/Makefile nls_cp1252.o > > It does seem as though this one would be useful to a significant > number of people. Is there some reason 125[2-46-8] are not included > where the rest are? Perhaps they aren't used in a form that makes any linux fs see them. cp1252 is not the codepage used by a windows smb server so you wouldn't need it for smbfs (same for vfat, ncpfs?), it would return data in the corresponding dos codepage (cp850). NTFS is unicode. cd/dvd formats are ... (?) Maybe I'm missing something. > uniset to output the necessary data. In fact, it seems like it would > be better to include the unicode table files in the kernel tree and > use a utility to generate the nls...c files as needed, yes?) I think so. A tool to build them would be nice, cp1252 or not. I did some editing before on them and the editor was perl (ok, so I suck at using awk and sed ...). Some format that allows different implementations to be used. All the iso* pages could share one implementation file but let the more advanced have different. That could of course be done with a simple "#include". /Urban - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/