Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760056AbZLQICK (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:02:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752445AbZLQICI (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:02:08 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:57852 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752401AbZLQICH (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:02:07 -0500 X-Authenticated: #20450766 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX180ygwHQDU0HgO/xjAdLiJjc9ZdkRDlIzpCIk9U0K UQRUfxUqIbVnkl Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:02:11 +0100 (CET) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: Paul Mundt cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu , Dan Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sh: dmaengine support for sh7724 In-Reply-To: <20091217074700.GA19805@linux-sh.org> Message-ID: References: <20091208071302.GA23814@linux-sh.org> <29ab51dc0912161914w6967c9d1l79df27d670f01b6a@mail.gmail.com> <20091217074700.GA19805@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1540 Lines: 37 Hi Paul On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:42:39AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > > This patch can not apply Paul's git/HEAD too. > > > I updated patch. > > > > > > Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > > > > Same comment applies as to the other my patch. Paul, I think, you > > indicated, that you've already merged my patch, or at least, that you have > > no problem merging it. Please, do use my original version and not this > > one. > > > I applied it by hand, so your authorship was retained, and I fixed up the > whitespace damage by hand (it looks like it was just line wrapping from > the mailer, which I deal with often enough that I no longer particularly > care for trivial patches). For the non-trivial patches, reposting those > without whitespace damage would be preferable. Hm, strange, are you sure _my_ original version was white-space damaged? I am quite sure my mailing chain behaves, and I just double-checked my patch as I got it back from the list - it looks ok to me. Would be interesting to know what specific white-space issues you found there, you could just mail me those off-list, if you like. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/