Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:50:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:50:35 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:40709 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:50:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:48:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: John Levon cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 In-Reply-To: <20020407173343.GA18940@compsoc.man.ac.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, John Levon wrote: > But what about the recent discussion on the removal of sys_call_table ? > > (I believe it was along the lines of "it's ugly, prevent it ...", "ah, > but it has real uses, so why can't it stay as deprecated/unadvised ?" > "*no response*"). > > I'm a bit disappointed this has just gone in without any real discussion > on the usefulness of this for certain circumstances :( Sure, removing that would break a lot of cracker software. Oh wait, maybe that's a good thing... For legitimate use, if any, a compile-time optional system call could be added requiring a capability to use, and programs which are currently doing that (AFS?) can be converted to use another f/s interface. I have seen a few mentions of software which DO use that capability, I'm not sure I've seen one which can be done no other way. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/