Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] nfs: fix ISO C90 warning
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
       Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <2375c9f90912170200m12a5310cg90343c5c1081fbb8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20091215165309.58e98eea.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	 <20091216142334.6a0ba115.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
	 <1261003219.13878.6.camel@localhost>
	 <20091216144700.34b80b4b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
	 <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912162355350.2755@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1261004497.13878.9.camel@localhost>
	 <2375c9f90912170200m12a5310cg90343c5c1081fbb8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:58:13 -0500
Message-Id: <1261087093.4080.36.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 697
Lines: 22

On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 18:00 +0800, Américo Wang wrote: 
> Hi,
> Check that currently all usages of RPC_DEBUG are the same,
> we can replace them all.
> 
> What do you think about the attached patch?
> 
> Sorry for attaching it, I have a bad mail environment here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>

Doesn't that approach instead lead to a lot of 'unreferenced variable'
warnings in the '#undef RPC_DEBUG' case?

Cheers
  Trond

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/