Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752882AbZLRUFa (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:05:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751872AbZLRUF3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:05:29 -0500 Received: from mx2.compro.net ([12.186.155.4]:12860 "EHLO mx2.compro.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751336AbZLRUF2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:05:28 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,420,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="4796301" Message-ID: <4B2BE05B.9050006@compro.net> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:04:43 -0500 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: markh@compro.net Organization: Compro Computer Svcs. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Mark Hounschell , Alain Knaff , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fdutils@fdutils.linux.lu Subject: Re: [Fdutils] DMA cache consistency bug introduced in 2.6.28 (Was: Re: Cannot format floppies under kernel 2.6.*?) References: <4AFB3962.2020106@ntlworld.com> <4B2901DB.8040403@compro.net> <4B29052B.9070406@knaff.lu> <4B292D84.5040306@compro.net> <4B29624F.2080109@knaff.lu> <4B2A3805.8040707@compro.net> <4B2A3E3E.8060405@knaff.lu> <4B2A4975.8020809@compro.net> <4B2A49F4.6070402@compro.net> <4B2A4B86.8060307@knaff.lu> <4B2A4C78.10107@compro.net> <4B2A4CF7.6040000@knaff.lu> <4B2A4EC9.2030902@compro.net> <4B2A4FA5.5000701@knaff.lu> <4B2A5192.6090602@compro.net> <4B2A530D.3080606@knaff! .lu> <4B2A6394.3080705@knaff.lu> <4B2A98BB.5080406@knaff.lu> <4B2AAC87.5000703@knaff.lu> <4B2ABDC8.6090104@knaff.lu> <4B2B4485.6000305@cfl.rr.com> <4B2B5F86.1090403@cfl.rr.com> <4B2B9F9F.7040802@compro.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2501 Lines: 61 On 12/18/2009 10:45 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Mark Hounschell wrote: >> >> Yep, thanks. I'm past that now. But haven't done a bisect [good|bad] on the >> results of that one yet. Did you see Alain's email response to my bisect >> progress report to him? >> >> I'm still at a loss as to how to proceed? > > Ahh, the HPET issue. > > That one is actually very interesting information, because we've had > problems with HPET before. But what I would suggest is to try to continue > to bisect with HPET enabled (to see the problem), and the commit that you > couldn't even boot with HPET enabled you should not count as good or bad > because you just don't know. > > You can do "git bisect skip" to make git know that some particular commit > is not a commit you can test, and you can also move away from a whole > problematic region to another area by doing > > git bisect visualize > > to bring up a graphical gitk view of what all you have left to bisect, > pick a good point (still _reasonably_ close to the middle) there, and do > > git reset --hard > > and try that kernel instead of the one git bisect suggested. > > But this floppy DMA inconsistency being somehow HPET-related is > interestign in itself. One thing that HPET does si to obviously change how > we read the time - and what that can cause (totally indirectly) is that > now we don't touch the southbridge with IO accesses nearly as much, > because instead of going to the old 8253 PIT will touch the same legacy > chip support that implements the floppy controller itself. > > So it's entirely possible that the reason a non-HPET setup doesn't show > this is that the accesses to the i8253 PIT part will "synchronize" the old > floppy controller too, and hide some issue. > > But still, I assume you had HPET enabled in 2.6.27, so it would be > interesting to see exactly when the problem starts. > > Linus > It looks like I may have to back up and first find the points that, let me, and stop me, booting with the HPET enabled. Before I change direction, can the git-bisect start sequence use the SHA1 id for the starting 'goods' and 'bads'? I don't see reference to that in the doc. Thanks Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/