Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750999AbZLSFdc (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:33:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750811AbZLSFdb (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:33:31 -0500 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:55440 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750801AbZLSFda (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:33:30 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Sage Weil Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph distributed file system client for 2.6.33 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:54:02 PST." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1261200797_3855P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:33:17 -0500 Message-ID: <14397.1261200797@localhost> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 128.173.34.103 localhost Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=neutral-1, source=Fixed, refid=n/a, actions=MAILHURDLE SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Info: (45) HELO_LOCALHOST X-Junkmail-Status: score=45/50, host=zidane.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020204.4B2C659F.0079,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-09-22 00:05:22, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1340 Lines: 37 --==_Exmh_1261200797_3855P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:54:02 PST, Sage Weil said: > I would still like to see ceph merged for 2.6.33. It's certainly not > production ready, but it would be greatly beneficial to be in mainline for > the same reasons other file systems like btrfs and exofs were merged > early. Is the on-the-wire protocol believed to be correct, complete, and stable? How about any userspace APIs and on-disk formats? In other words.. > > The git tree includes the full patchset posted in October and incremental > > changes since then. I've tried to cram in all the anticipated protocol > > changes, but the file system is still strictly EXPERIMENTAL and is marked Anything left dangling on the changes? --==_Exmh_1261200797_3855P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFLLGWdcC3lWbTT17ARAgDgAKD92sdfp2Q4T6ucKJyVthh0gJ26fQCgvvMb JSVxggXzOMQn42BaiIFX++U= =wkjY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1261200797_3855P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/