Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756812AbZLUQmy (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:42:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756074AbZLUQmu (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:42:50 -0500 Received: from cobra.newdream.net ([66.33.216.30]:49705 "EHLO cobra.newdream.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756070AbZLUQms (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:42:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:42:47 -0800 (PST) From: Sage Weil To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph distributed file system client for 2.6.33 In-Reply-To: <14397.1261200797@localhost> Message-ID: References: <14397.1261200797@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1606 Lines: 35 On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:54:02 PST, Sage Weil said: > > I would still like to see ceph merged for 2.6.33. It's certainly not > > production ready, but it would be greatly beneficial to be in mainline for > > the same reasons other file systems like btrfs and exofs were merged > > early. > > Is the on-the-wire protocol believed to be correct, complete, and stable? How > about any userspace APIs and on-disk formats? In other words.. > > > > The git tree includes the full patchset posted in October and incremental > > > changes since then. I've tried to cram in all the anticipated protocol > > > changes, but the file system is still strictly EXPERIMENTAL and is marked > > Anything left dangling on the changes? The wire protocol is close. There is a corner cases with MDS failure recovery that need attention, but it can be resolved in a backward compatible way. I think a compat/incompat flags mechanism during the initial handshake might be appropriate to make changes easier going forward. I don't anticipate any other changes there. There are some as-yet unresolved interface and performance issues with the way the storage nodes interact with btrfs that have on disk format implications. I hope to resolve those shortly. Those of course do not impact the client code. sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/