Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757287AbZLUUyk (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:54:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757152AbZLUUyi (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:54:38 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:56024 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757226AbZLUUyi (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:54:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:54:36 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: pm list , ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results In-Reply-To: <200912212136.12665.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 695 Lines: 18 On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Do you think it's a good idea to mark all SCSI devices as async? Well, for > testing it probably is, but I doubt in general. That would be a good question to post on Linux-SCSI. In most respects it's probably okay. But some people with large disk farms might not like it if their drives should suddenly start to spin up (with a correspondingly large power draw) all at the same time. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/