DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=nEApLaWxsiXmso8VkGUzqSzz7HAQjNUg9jNjbh20CLwDEddfq7s6aiMXC8y0BDXduz
         Ll1Id16Rfq1RKFIrQXbHqwEI9tYc9hSvX9+5pW5p3+pe40HqLmQi3of7l4iL1ATuGImc
         ikl3PkUHMHtvG4BcR1jMuA91gxdiY6R1ZUeV0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1261324276.7227.11.camel@marge.simson.net>
References: <1261042383.14314.0.camel@localhost> <1261195412.8240.153.camel@marge.simson.net> 
	<1261244163.14314.62.camel@localhost> <200912200422.18314.andres@anarazel.de> 
	<1261311050.14314.67.camel@localhost> <1261321981.6105.60.camel@marge.simson.net> 
	<1261324276.7227.11.camel@marge.simson.net>
From: Jason Garrett-Glaser <darkshikari@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:33:08 -0500
Message-ID: <28f2fcbc0912212333yd35f8a8jf0c7087b74fd3582@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
       Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
       LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 548
Lines: 14

Benchmarks for the new threading model are up, along with a few others:

http://doom10.org/index.php?topic=78.0

Interestingly enough, CFS beats BFS on zerolatency by a significant
margin.  Unsurprisingly, given the threading model, the optimal number
of threads is equal to the number of cores.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/