Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756785AbZLWSXj (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:23:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755734AbZLWSXi (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:23:38 -0500 Received: from sous-sol.org ([216.99.217.87]:42057 "EHLO sequoia.sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755587AbZLWSXh (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:23:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:22:21 -0800 From: Chris Wright To: "Peter W. Morreale" Cc: Andi Kleen , Avi Kivity , Gregory Haskins , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , Anthony Liguori , Ingo Molnar , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Alacrityvm-devel] [GIT PULL] AlacrityVM guest drivers for 2.6.33 Message-ID: <20091223182221.GA415@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <4B1D4F29.8020309@gmail.com> <87637zdy9g.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4B30E654.40702@codemonkey.ws> <200912221701.56840.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4B30F214.80206@codemonkey.ws> <20091223065129.GA19600@elte.hu> <20091223101340.GC20539@basil.fritz.box> <4B31EF65.6070000@redhat.com> <20091223121431.GF20539@basil.fritz.box> <1261590740.19822.94.camel@hermosa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1261590740.19822.94.camel@hermosa> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1062 Lines: 29 * Peter W. Morreale (pmorreale@novell.com) wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 13:14 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/summit/cwright_11_open_source_virt.pdf > > > > > > See slide 32. This is without vhost-net. > > > > Thanks. Do you also have latency numbers? > > > > It seems like there's definitely still potential for improvement > > with messages <4K. But for the large messages they indeed > > look rather good. > > > > It's unclear what message size the Alacrity numbers used, but I presume > > it was rather large. > > No. It was 1500. Please see: > > http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/AlacrityVM/Results That's just MTU. Not the message size. We can infer the message size by the bare metal results (reasonably large), but is helpful to record that. thanks, -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/