Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755647AbZLXBqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:46:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751077AbZLXBq2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:46:28 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:10600 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750973AbZLXBq1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:46:27 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,316,1257148800"; d="scan'208";a="226238720" Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:46:20 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Martin Knoblauch Cc: Steve Rago , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" , "jens.axboe" Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads Message-ID: <20091224014620.GA8299@localhost> References: <1261015420.1947.54.camel@serenity> <1261037877.27920.36.camel@laptop> <20091219122033.GA11360@localhost> <1261232747.1947.194.camel@serenity> <20091222015907.GA6223@localhost> <787373.9318.qm@web113309.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <787373.9318.qm@web113309.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 12429 Lines: 301 Hi Martin, On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:01:46PM +0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Wu Fengguang > > To: Steve Rago > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra ; "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" ; "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" ; "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" ; jens.axboe > > Sent: Tue, December 22, 2009 2:59:07 AM > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads > > > > [big snip] > > > > > In general it's reasonable to keep NFS per-file nr_dirty low, however > > questionable to do per-file nr_writeback throttling. This does not > > work well with the global limits - eg. when there are many dirty > > files, the summed-up nr_writeback will still grow out of control. > > And it's more likely to impact user visible responsiveness than > > a global limit. But my opinion can be biased -- me have a patch to > > do global NFS nr_writeback limit ;) > > > > > is that "NFS: introduce writeback wait queue", which you sent me a while ago and I did not test until now :-( ? Yes it is - I've been puzzled by some bumpy NFS write problem, and the information in this thread seem to be helpful to understand it :) Thanks, Fengguang --- NFS: introduce writeback wait queue The generic writeback routines are departing from congestion_wait() in preferance of get_request_wait(), aka. waiting on the block queues. Introduce the missing writeback wait queue for NFS, otherwise its writeback pages may grow out of control. In perticular, balance_dirty_pages() will exit after it pushes write_chunk pages into the PG_writeback page pool, _OR_ when the background writeback work quits. The latter is new behavior, and could not only quit (normally) after below background threshold, but also quit when it finds _zero_ dirty pages to write. The latter case gives rise to the number of PG_writeback pages if it is not explicitly limited. CC: Jens Axboe CC: Chris Mason CC: Peter Zijlstra CC: Peter Staubach CC: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang --- The wait time and network throughput varies a lot! this is a major problem. This means nfs_end_page_writeback() is not called smoothly over time, even when there are plenty of PG_writeback pages on the client side. [ 397.828509] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=16ms [ 397.850976] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 403.065244] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=5212ms [ 403.549134] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=1536 time=144ms [ 403.570717] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 403.595749] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 403.622171] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=24ms [ 403.651779] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=28ms [ 403.680543] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=24ms [ 403.712572] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=28ms [ 403.751552] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=36ms [ 403.785979] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=28ms [ 403.823995] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=36ms [ 403.858970] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=32ms [ 403.880786] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=16ms [ 403.902732] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 403.925925] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 403.952044] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=258 time=24ms [ 403.974006] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=16ms [ 403.995989] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 405.031049] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=1032ms [ 405.257635] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=1536 time=192ms [ 405.279069] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 405.300843] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=16ms [ 405.326031] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 405.350843] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=24ms [ 405.375160] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 409.331015] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=3952ms [ 409.587928] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=1536 time=152ms [ 409.610068] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=20ms [ 409.635736] write_bandwidth: comm=nfsiod pages=192 time=24ms # vmmon -d 1 nr_writeback nr_dirty nr_unstable nr_writeback nr_dirty nr_unstable 11227 41463 38044 11227 41463 38044 11227 41463 38044 11227 41463 38044 11045 53987 6490 11033 53120 8145 11195 52143 10886 11211 52144 10913 11211 52144 10913 11211 52144 10913 11056 56887 3876 11062 55298 8155 11214 54485 9838 11225 54461 9852 11225 54461 9852 11225 54461 4582 22342 35535 7823 ----total-cpu-usage---- -dsk/total- -net/total- ---paging-- ---system-- usr sys idl wai hiq siq| read writ| recv send| in out | int csw 0 0 9 92 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 306B| 0 0 |1003 377 0 1 39 60 0 1| 0 0 | 90k 1361k| 0 0 |1765 1599 0 15 12 43 0 31| 0 0 |2292k 34M| 0 0 | 12k 16k 0 0 16 84 0 0| 0 0 | 132B 306B| 0 0 |1003 376 0 0 43 57 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 306B| 0 0 |1004 376 0 7 25 55 0 13| 0 0 |1202k 18M| 0 0 |7331 8921 0 8 21 55 0 15| 0 0 |1195k 18M| 0 0 |5382 6579 0 0 38 62 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 306B| 0 0 |1002 371 0 0 33 67 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 306B| 0 0 |1003 376 0 14 20 41 0 24| 0 0 |1621k 24M| 0 0 |8549 10k 0 5 31 55 0 9| 0 0 | 769k 11M| 0 0 |4444 5180 0 0 18 82 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 568B| 0 0 |1004 377 0 1 41 54 0 3| 0 0 | 184k 2777k| 0 0 |2609 2619 1 13 22 43 0 22| 0 0 |1572k 23M| 0 0 |8138 10k 0 11 9 59 0 20| 0 0 |1861k 27M| 0 0 |9576 13k 0 5 23 66 0 5| 0 0 | 540k 8122k| 0 0 |2816 2885 fs/nfs/client.c | 2 fs/nfs/write.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- linux.orig/fs/nfs/write.c 2009-11-06 09:52:23.000000000 +0800 +++ linux/fs/nfs/write.c 2009-11-06 09:52:27.000000000 +0800 @@ -187,11 +187,65 @@ static int wb_priority(struct writeback_ * NFS congestion control */ +#define NFS_WAIT_PAGES (1024L >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - 10)) int nfs_congestion_kb; -#define NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH (nfs_congestion_kb >> (PAGE_SHIFT-10)) -#define NFS_CONGESTION_OFF_THRESH \ - (NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH - (NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH >> 2)) +/* + * SYNC requests will block on (2*limit) and wakeup on (2*limit-NFS_WAIT_PAGES) + * ASYNC requests will block on (limit) and wakeup on (limit - NFS_WAIT_PAGES) + * In this way SYNC writes will never be blocked by ASYNC ones. + */ + +static void nfs_set_congested(long nr, long limit, + struct backing_dev_info *bdi) +{ + if (nr > limit && !test_bit(BDI_async_congested, &bdi->state)) + set_bdi_congested(bdi, BLK_RW_ASYNC); + else if (nr > 2 * limit && !test_bit(BDI_sync_congested, &bdi->state)) + set_bdi_congested(bdi, BLK_RW_SYNC); +} + +static void nfs_wait_contested(int is_sync, + struct backing_dev_info *bdi, + wait_queue_head_t *wqh) +{ + int waitbit = is_sync ? BDI_sync_congested : BDI_async_congested; + DEFINE_WAIT(wait); + + if (!test_bit(waitbit, &bdi->state)) + return; + + for (;;) { + prepare_to_wait(&wqh[is_sync], &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + if (!test_bit(waitbit, &bdi->state)) + break; + + io_schedule(); + } + finish_wait(&wqh[is_sync], &wait); +} + +static void nfs_wakeup_congested(long nr, long limit, + struct backing_dev_info *bdi, + wait_queue_head_t *wqh) +{ + if (nr < 2*limit - min(limit/8, NFS_WAIT_PAGES)) { + if (test_bit(BDI_sync_congested, &bdi->state)) { + clear_bdi_congested(bdi, BLK_RW_SYNC); + smp_mb__after_clear_bit(); + } + if (waitqueue_active(&wqh[BLK_RW_SYNC])) + wake_up(&wqh[BLK_RW_SYNC]); + } + if (nr < limit - min(limit/8, NFS_WAIT_PAGES)) { + if (test_bit(BDI_async_congested, &bdi->state)) { + clear_bdi_congested(bdi, BLK_RW_ASYNC); + smp_mb__after_clear_bit(); + } + if (waitqueue_active(&wqh[BLK_RW_ASYNC])) + wake_up(&wqh[BLK_RW_ASYNC]); + } +} static int nfs_set_page_writeback(struct page *page) { @@ -201,11 +255,9 @@ static int nfs_set_page_writeback(struct struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host; struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode); - if (atomic_long_inc_return(&nfss->writeback) > - NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH) { - set_bdi_congested(&nfss->backing_dev_info, - BLK_RW_ASYNC); - } + nfs_set_congested(atomic_long_inc_return(&nfss->writeback), + nfs_congestion_kb >> (PAGE_SHIFT-10), + &nfss->backing_dev_info); } return ret; } @@ -216,8 +268,11 @@ static void nfs_end_page_writeback(struc struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode); end_page_writeback(page); - if (atomic_long_dec_return(&nfss->writeback) < NFS_CONGESTION_OFF_THRESH) - clear_bdi_congested(&nfss->backing_dev_info, BLK_RW_ASYNC); + + nfs_wakeup_congested(atomic_long_dec_return(&nfss->writeback), + nfs_congestion_kb >> (PAGE_SHIFT-10), + &nfss->backing_dev_info, + nfss->writeback_wait); } static struct nfs_page *nfs_find_and_lock_request(struct page *page) @@ -309,19 +364,34 @@ static int nfs_writepage_locked(struct p int nfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc) { + struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host; + struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode); int ret; ret = nfs_writepage_locked(page, wbc); unlock_page(page); + + nfs_wait_contested(wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL, + &nfss->backing_dev_info, + nfss->writeback_wait); + return ret; } -static int nfs_writepages_callback(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data) +static int nfs_writepages_callback(struct page *page, + struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data) { + struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host; + struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode); int ret; ret = nfs_do_writepage(page, wbc, data); unlock_page(page); + + nfs_wait_contested(wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL, + &nfss->backing_dev_info, + nfss->writeback_wait); + return ret; } --- linux.orig/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h 2009-11-06 09:22:30.000000000 +0800 +++ linux/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h 2009-11-06 09:52:27.000000000 +0800 @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ struct nfs_server { struct nfs_iostats * io_stats; /* I/O statistics */ struct backing_dev_info backing_dev_info; atomic_long_t writeback; /* number of writeback pages */ + wait_queue_head_t writeback_wait[2]; int flags; /* various flags */ unsigned int caps; /* server capabilities */ unsigned int rsize; /* read size */ --- linux.orig/fs/nfs/client.c 2009-11-06 09:22:30.000000000 +0800 +++ linux/fs/nfs/client.c 2009-11-06 09:52:27.000000000 +0800 @@ -991,6 +991,8 @@ static struct nfs_server *nfs_alloc_serv INIT_LIST_HEAD(&server->master_link); atomic_set(&server->active, 0); + init_waitqueue_head(&server->writeback_wait[BLK_RW_SYNC]); + init_waitqueue_head(&server->writeback_wait[BLK_RW_ASYNC]); server->io_stats = nfs_alloc_iostats(); if (!server->io_stats) { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/