Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757177AbZLYU5H (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:57:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756650AbZLYU5F (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:57:05 -0500 Received: from mail.crca.org.au ([67.207.131.56]:43204 "EHLO crca.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756630AbZLYU5F (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:57:05 -0500 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Message-ID: <4B35272D.7040207@crca.org.au> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:57:17 +1100 From: Nigel Cunningham User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Jiri Slaby , Dmitry Torokhov , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results References: <200912210140.19713.rjw@sisk.pl> <200912232146.29339.rjw@sisk.pl> <4B32D2D6.3030707@crca.org.au> <200912242310.42615.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200912242310.42615.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1483 Lines: 40 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 24 December 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> Hi. > > Hi, > >> I built the async branch of your tree and tested it, also running >> 2.6.33-rc1 + TuxOnIce for comparison. Dmesg for both are attached. Is >> there anything I can/should be doing for you on top of this? > > No, thanks a lot. > >> I'll try Dmitry's patch on top of this a little later - other things to do first. > > No need for that, the patchset contains an equivalent of the Dmitry's patch. > >> I noticed that you were doing standard deviations in your stats - how >> many runs were you basing them on? > > I usually run 10 iterations of suspend-resume for each configuration. > The raw data are at http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/data/async-suspend-updated.pdf > if you're interested. > >> Not sure that I can be bothered to do too many - too much else to do! > > Sure, thanks a lot anyway. Your data confirn that there's a measurable gain > from suspending and resuming devices asynchronously. It did? I thought it showed no difference at all! I'll see if I can find the time to do the other computers, then. We're going away for a couple of weeks on Monday, though, so I'm not sure that I'll get the time beforehand. Nigel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/