Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:16:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:16:21 -0400 Received: from dyn-212-129-51-155.ppp.tiscali.fr ([212.129.51.155]:33410 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:16:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 01:11:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Rui Sousa X-X-Sender: rsousa@localhost.localdomain To: "J. Dow" cc: "T. A." , , Martin Dalecki , Kurt Wall , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: C++ and the kernel In-Reply-To: <018201c1e010$a5fc52c0$1125a8c0@wednesday> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, J. Dow wrote: > From: "T. A." > > > Who the heck said anything about rewriting the kernel? I'm just looking > > into coding a C++ framework for those whom may like to use it in modules, > > mostly for hack value. > > May I humbly suggest that this list is not a good place for this discussion. > Attitudes are quite ossified for many good reasons and probably a few bad > reasons... I hate to get into this discussion(1)... but could you at least read a little bit beyond the subject line before answering. The bits like "who that heck said anything about rewriting the kernel?" and "hack value"... Rui Sousa (1) Yeah, ok I did it any way. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/