Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751746AbZL0Vwt (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:52:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751472AbZL0Vws (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:52:48 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:38695 "EHLO mail-iw0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751364AbZL0Vwr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:52:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ow4Ylw29N9YT/iOgsdB553fMYX1Y1LcBgHaCdVuiPABlra1eDJmPcMk48LB6HUlH3F d2JwseC7hKF8yHVmwwH+YQqTgQ7W+/LZMmGdzIcm8pjG02f4m78UF4TCw/YIrfWFLNtw ccioHCCtdBGMd+Rf++owKh94vAp78Yj/8oeNI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7c8826910912191437k4e1d93bap12874a6d6e0046d3@mail.gmail.com> References: <7c8826910912182213o2e0e8af7ic305f150c52e0618@mail.gmail.com> <4B2C80DD.9080005@garzik.org> <4B2D1CF3.4070106@gmail.com> <7c8826910912191437k4e1d93bap12874a6d6e0046d3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:52:46 -0600 Message-ID: <51f3faa70912271352g2784edc8oc899bd6def7b7275@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.32 seemed to have broken nVidia MCP7A sata controller From: Robert Hancock To: Mike Cui Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3058 Lines: 68 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Mike Cui wrote: > Thanks, changing that one line fixed it. I can try to find an intel > motherboard sometime next week to see if it's the drive or the > controller. Hi Mike, did you ever get a chance to try this test? > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: >> On 12/19/2009 01:29 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> >>> On 12/19/2009 01:13 AM, Mike Cui wrote: >>>> >>>> I have an nVidia MCP7A AHCI controller. I upgraded to 2.6.32.2 and my >>>> system deterministically freezes trying to mount file systems. Once in >>>> a while it will come back and finish booting after freezing for 1 >>>> minute or 2. dmesg indicates that there were NCQ errors, but 2.6.31 >>>> anb before has always worked flawlessly for me. What changed in >>>> 2.6.32? I will be more than happy to help track down this issue. >>> >>>> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen >>>> ata1.00: cmd 61/08:00:4f:ad:03/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 4096 out >>>> res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout) >>>> ata1: hard resetting link >>>> ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >>>> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 >>>> ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0 >>> >>> Looks like things are timing out, and then go downhill from there. This >>> explanation of timeout gives some hints on possible causes: >>> http://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Libata_error_messages#Error_classes >>> >>> The ideal would be if you could bisect between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32, to see >>> if it's a software change that is the cause. >>> >>> Looking at drivers/ata/ahci.c history, the only thing that -might- cause >>> problems is 388539f3ff0cf1de926b03f94e1eec112358f74d ('git show $commit' >>> for full commit info and diff). >> >> I suspect that as well (it's the commit that adds FPDMA auto-activate on DMA >> setup FIS support). Your drive indicates it's supported but it's possible >> it's broken on that drive or the controller. If the drive doesn't set the >> activate bit in the DMA setup FIS properly or the controller doesn't respect >> it, then FPDMA requests will stall. >> >> Mike, can you try and revert that patch, or else just change this line in >> drivers/ata/ahci.c: >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?pi.flags |= ATA_FLAG_NCQ | ATA_FLAG_FPDMA_AA; >> >> to >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?pi.flags |= ATA_FLAG_NCQ; >> >> and rebuild and see if it works better? >> >> I tend to suspect the controller is the problem (I've got WD drives that >> work fine with AA on Intel AHCI, though it could be model-specific). I guess >> the only way to verify for sure which one it is would be if someone else had >> that particular drive model on a different AHCI controller and could verify >> if it worked with 2.6.32+ or not. >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/