Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753257AbZL3Sph (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:45:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752992AbZL3Sph (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:45:37 -0500 Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:47470 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752830AbZL3Spg (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:45:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:45:35 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Corrado Zoccolo Cc: Linux-Kernel , Jeff Moyer , Vivek Goyal , Shaohua Li , Gui Jianfeng Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need queue merging Message-ID: <20091230184535.GE4489@kernel.dk> References: <1262175004-2132-1-git-send-email-czoccolo@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1262175004-2132-1-git-send-email-czoccolo@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 671 Lines: 20 On Wed, Dec 30 2009, Corrado Zoccolo wrote: > Non rotational devices' performances are not affected by > distance of requests, so there is no point in having overhead > to merge queues of nearby requests. If the distance is zero, it may still make a big difference (at least for writes). This check would be better as "ncq and doesn't suck", ala blk_queue_nonrot(q) && tagged like we do elsewhere. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/