Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752948Ab0ADAP1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:15:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752219Ab0ADAP0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:15:26 -0500 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:33405 "EHLO e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751583Ab0ADAP0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:15:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:45:16 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Menage , Li Zefan , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Pavel Emelyanov , Dan Malek , Vladislav Buzov , Daisuke Nishimura , Alexander Shishkin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] cgroup notifications API and memory thresholds Message-ID: <20100104001516.GE16187@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20091227124732.GA3601@balbir.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2564 Lines: 69 * Kirill A. Shutemov [2009-12-27 20:37:57]: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: > > * Kirill A. Shutemov [2009-12-27 04:08:58]: > > > >> This patchset introduces eventfd-based API for notifications in cgroups and > >> implements memory notifications on top of it. > >> > >> It uses statistics in memory controler to track memory usage. > >> > >> Output of time(1) on building kernel on tmpfs: > >> > >> Root cgroup before changes: > >> ? ? ? make -j2 ?506.37 user 60.93s system 193% cpu 4:52.77 total > >> Non-root cgroup before changes: > >> ? ? ? make -j2 ?507.14 user 62.66s system 193% cpu 4:54.74 total > >> Root cgroup after changes (0 thresholds): > >> ? ? ? make -j2 ?507.13 user 62.20s system 193% cpu 4:53.55 total > >> Non-root cgroup after changes (0 thresholds): > >> ? ? ? make -j2 ?507.70 user 64.20s system 193% cpu 4:55.70 total > >> Root cgroup after changes (1 thresholds, never crossed): > >> ? ? ? make -j2 ?506.97 user 62.20s system 193% cpu 4:53.90 total > >> Non-root cgroup after changes (1 thresholds, never crossed): > >> ? ? ? make -j2 ?507.55 user 64.08s system 193% cpu 4:55.63 total > >> > >> Any comments? > > > > Thanks for adding the documentation, now on to more critical questions > > > > 1. Any reasons for not using cgroupstats? > > Could you explain the idea? I don't see how cgroupstats applicable for > the task. cgroupstats allows you to notify task statistics or send notifications, hence the applicability. > > > 2. Is there a user space test application to test this code. > > Attached. It's not very clean, but good enough for testing propose. > Example of usage: > > $ echo '/cgroups/memory.usage_in_bytes 1G' | ./cgroup_event_monitor > Thanks, I'll test it right now. > > ?IIUC, > > I need to write a program that uses eventfd(2) and then passes > > the eventfd descriptor and thresold to cgroup.*event* file and > > then the program will get notified when the threshold is reached? > > You need to pass eventfd descriptor, descriptor of control file to be > monitored (memory.usage_in_bytes or memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes) and > threshold. > > Do you want to rename cgroup.event_control to cgroup.event? No, event_control seems like a good name ATM. -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/