Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 00:04:27 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: kgdb tree build failure
Message-Id: <20100105000427.b10232d3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <4B41E542.40703@windriver.com>
References: <20100104164209.a5ac8d6a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	<20100104164452.2803d62e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	<4B41E542.40703@windriver.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="PGP-SHA1";
 boundary="Signature=_Tue__5_Jan_2010_00_04_27_+1100_4TJ_B_jz+t74Sd7o"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1298
Lines: 41

--Signature=_Tue__5_Jan_2010_00_04_27_+1100_4TJ_B_jz+t74Sd7o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jason,

On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:55:30 -0600 Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com=
> wrote:
>
> That patch could have been dropped from the series, but I did repair the
> problem.  I also added a 3 more config tests (sparc, arm and ppc) to my
> pre-submission test list.
>=20
> kgdb-next is updated and I can only hope the light is at the end of the
> tunnel for the config testing. :-)

OK, thanks.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

--Signature=_Tue__5_Jan_2010_00_04_27_+1100_4TJ_B_jz+t74Sd7o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktB51sACgkQjjKRsyhoI8w1eACeMG+bmTgNYur9VqMXXbp27YUi
J8AAoJM4JyMIlI+FcB/UJ+4Kij1kA4oh
=6Kvo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Tue__5_Jan_2010_00_04_27_+1100_4TJ_B_jz+t74Sd7o--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/