Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754782Ab0AEPEu (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:04:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754650Ab0AEPEr (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:04:47 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:35314 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754698Ab0AEPEq (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:04:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:06:58 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Rabin Vincent Cc: Simon Horman , mmarek@suse.cz, wangcong@zeuux.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: add ARM support to decodecode Message-ID: <20100105070658.766317d2@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20100105145758.GA2690@debian> References: <1262184839-24497-1-git-send-email-rabin@rab.in> <20091231051858.GA31256@verge.net.au> <20100105145758.GA2690@debian> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1319 Lines: 36 On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:27:58 +0530 Rabin Vincent wrote: > This patch adds support for decoding ARM oopses to scripts/decodecode. > The following things are handled: > > - ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE environment variables are respected. > > - The Code: in x86 oopses is in bytes, while it is in either words (4 > bytes) or halfwords for ARM. > > - Some versions of ARM objdump refuse to disassemble instructions > generated by literal constants (".word 0x..."). The workaround is > to strip the object file first. > > - The faulting instruction is marked (liked so) in ARM, but > in x86. > > - ARM mnemonics may include characters such as [] which need to be > escaped before being passed to sed for the "<- trapping > instruction" substitution. I'm fine with this, but I wonder if ARM could switch to the <> convention for the faulting instruction, just to keep things consistent.. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/