Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755396Ab0AETdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:33:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755308Ab0AETdn (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:33:43 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:41197 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753663Ab0AETdn (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:33:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:26:17 -0800 From: Greg KH To: nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp Cc: LKML , linux-mm , KOSAKI Motohiro , David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , stable , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [stable] [BUGFIX][PATCH v3] memcg: avoid oom-killing innocent task in case of use_hierarchy Message-ID: <20100105192617.GA9681@kroah.com> References: <20091124145759.194cfc9f.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20091124162854.fb31e81e.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20091125090050.e366dca5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091125143218.96156a5f.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20091217094724.15ec3b27.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20100104222818.GA20708@kroah.com> <20100105122633.28738255.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100105122633.28738255.d-nishimura@mtf.biglobe.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1194 Lines: 31 On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:26:33PM +0900, Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:28:19 -0800 > Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:47:24AM +0900, Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > > > Stable team. > > > > > > Cay you pick this up for 2.6.32.y(and 2.6.31.y if it will be released) ? > > > > > > This is a for-stable version of a bugfix patch that corresponds to the > > > upstream commmit d31f56dbf8bafaacb0c617f9a6f137498d5c7aed. > > > > I've applied it to the .32-stable tree, but it does not apply to .31. > > Care to provide a version of the patch for that kernel if you want it > > applied there? > > > hmm, strange. I can apply it onto 2.6.31.9. It might conflict with other patches > in 2.6.31.y queue ? > Anyway, I've attached the patch that is rebased on 2.6.31.9. Please tell me if you > have any problem with it. > > v3: rebased on 2.6.31.9 This version worked, thanks for regenerating it. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/