Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754759Ab0AFDH7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:07:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752862Ab0AFDH6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:07:58 -0500 Received: from e28smtp04.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.4]:49323 "EHLO e28smtp04.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754172Ab0AFDH6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:07:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:37:52 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Andrew Morton , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] Shared Page accounting for memory cgroup (v2) Message-ID: <20100106030752.GI3059@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20100105185226.GG3059@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20100106090708.f3ec9fd8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100106090708.f3ec9fd8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1685 Lines: 43 * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2010-01-06 09:07:08]: > On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 00:22:26 +0530 > Balbir Singh wrote: > > > Hi, All, > > > > No major changes from v1, except for the use of get_mm_rss(). > > Kamezawa-San felt that this can be done in user space and I responded > > to him with my concerns of doing it in user space. The thread > > can be found at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/42367. > > > > If there are no major objections, can I ask for a merge into -mm. > > Andrew, the patches are against mmotm 10 December 2009, if there > > are some merge conflicts, please let me know, I can rebase after > > you release the next mmotm. > > > > The problem is that this isn't "shared" uasge but "considered to be shared" > usage. Okay ? > Could you give me your definition of "shared". From the mem cgroup perspective, total_rss (which is accumulated) subtracted from the count of pages in the LRU which are RSS and FILE_MAPPED is shared, no? I understand that some of the pages that might be shared, show up in our LRU and accounting. These are not treated as shared by our cgroup, but by other cgroups. > Then I don't want to provide this misleading value as "official report" from > the kernel. And this can be done in userland. > I explained some of the issues of doing this from user space, would you be OK if I called them "non-private" pages? -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/