Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 02:43:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 02:43:02 -0400 Received: from rj.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.100]:62374 "EHLO rj.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 02:43:01 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Mike Fedyk Cc: Neil Brown , Richard Gooch , Andreas Dilger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RAID superblock confusion In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:41:11 MST." <20020411024111.GL23513@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:42:20 +1000 Message-ID: <3004.1018507340@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:41:11 -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: >Then you'd just need to make sure that if there are any block modules linked >into the kernel that raid is also linked into the kernle instead of a module. > >Is there some reason why this wouldn't work (except for CML1 >complications...)? > >Kieth, will kbuild2.5 affect this in any way? Or is this entirely a CML2 >thing? AFAICT it is pure config. kbuild 2.5 does not care how .config is built, it just requires a clean .config. I want a clean seperation between configuring and building the kernel. In particular, Makefile rules should not try to adjust for broken config entries, this is a config only problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/