Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:51:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: nfs/ceph tree build failure
In-Reply-To: <20100108121903.6a096bc1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001072048420.7474@cobra.newdream.net>
References: <20100108111136.3feae8c6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
 <1262909913.2659.47.camel@localhost> <20100108121903.6a096bc1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 873
Lines: 29

On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi Trond,
> 
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:18:33 -0500 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:
> >
> > The patch itself looks correct to me.
> 
> Thanks for the confirmation.

Yep, looks good.

> > How would you like me to proceed? Should I revert the VM changes from
> > the NFS linux-next tree, or would you be OK with keeping the above patch
> > for now?
> 
> I am OK with keeping the patch - we just need to remember it during the
> next merge window.

Okay.  I can move it to my tree as well, where I assume it'll need to be 
when it comes time to merge.

Thanks-
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/