Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753493Ab0AIU0a (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:26:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752948Ab0AIU0a (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:26:30 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:33218 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751804Ab0AIU03 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:26:29 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 20:30:22 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: "Paul G. Allen" Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Linux Serial Performance Message-ID: <20100109203022.3e506602@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 994 Lines: 21 > I am wondering, have there been any performance tests comparing Linux > serial IO to Windows and what was the result? Is it a problem in the Our peak throughput is about 40-50Mbits/second > comm API (e.g. - the Windows DLL having better performance than the > Linux .so)? Is it a problem in the Linux serial driver itself? Is > there something I can/need to do on Linux to tweak the driver and make > it faster? You probably need to ask a java list and profile it below the java level to get answers here. It's possible there are small performance differences between Linux and Windows at 115,200 but I'd not expect any except maybe in latency and then only small ones. The number of java experts on the kernel list is quite small I'm afraid. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/