Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:06:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:06:27 -0400 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([195.39.74.230]:47825 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:06:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:06:06 +0200 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Rene Rebe Cc: john@antefacto.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux as a minicomputer ? Message-ID: <20020411210606.A15783@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20020411170910.GS612@gallifrey> <20020411191339.B15435@ucw.cz> <20020411174941.GC17962@antefacto.com> <20020411.195921.730560311.rene.rebe@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:59:21PM +0200, Rene Rebe wrote: > On: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:49:42 +0000, > "John P. Looney" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:13:39PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik mentioned: > > > > I'd presumed this was > > > > the whole point of the busid spec in the config file. > > > No, it's for running one Xserver on multiple displays at once only. > > > Sad, ain't it? > > > > Very sad. Nice to know it's not really the kernel's fault. > > It IS the kernel's fault, because only one VT can be active. The > kernel VT stuff needs to be redesigned to hadle multiple VT at the > same time ... Yes and no. You shouldn't need VTs to run Xservers at all. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/