Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753436Ab0AJPVg (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:21:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753238Ab0AJPVg (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:21:36 -0500 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:18718 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752629Ab0AJPVf (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:21:35 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,5856"; a="31728433" Subject: Re: trouble compiling dwalker's for-next tree From: Daniel Walker To: Pavel Machek Cc: Arve Hj?nnev?g , kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , Brian Swetland , Iliyan Malchev In-Reply-To: <20100109085106.GA23290@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20100109085106.GA23290@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:19:05 -0800 Message-Id: <1263136745.2446.13.camel@desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1462 Lines: 40 On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 09:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > It is great to have all changes merged, but I ran into some trouble: > > 1) mmc.h was missing. > > 2) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o > arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c: In function 'msm_chg_rpc_connect': > arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of > function 'machine_is_msm7201a_surf' > arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of > function 'machine_is_msm7x27_surf' > arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:157: error: implicit declaration of > function 'machine_is_qsd8x50_surf' > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o] Error 1 > > (I provided missing inlines) > > 3) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.o > arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:31:35: error: linux/remote_spinlock.h: > No such file or directory > arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:106: error: expected '=', ',', ';', > 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'pll_lock' > It's still really really un-cooked .. There's tons of compile failures that still need to be cleanup .. Most of the targets aren't going to compile without tuning the config some.. What config are you using? I can try to correct some of the compile failure .. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/