Subject: Re: [Bug #14621] specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc
 kernels
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
       Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <CXIfLt-ygXM.A.DuD.cilSLB@chimera>
References: <nzLqtSp97aP.A.RGB.hglSLB@chimera>
	 <CXIfLt-ygXM.A.DuD.cilSLB@chimera>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:05:28 +0100
Message-Id: <1263193528.6444.21.camel@marge.simson.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1128
Lines: 27

On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14621
> Subject		: specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc kernels
> Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Date		: 2009-11-06 7:38 (66 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125749310413174&w=4

FWIW, I couldn't reproduce the aim7 regression with my one little disk,
the opposite in fact, attributable to cfq low_latency switch.

(don't have specjbb2005, can't try to reproduce that one)

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/