Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753517Ab0AKPPn (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:15:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753499Ab0AKPPl (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:15:41 -0500 Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:51971 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753139Ab0AKPPk (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:15:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:15:39 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Divyesh Shah Cc: czoccolo@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nauman@google.com, mikew@google.com, ctalbott@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: Respect ioprio_class when preempting Message-ID: <20100111151539.GP4489@kernel.dk> References: <20100107025413.27610.48801.stgit@austin.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100107025413.27610.48801.stgit@austin.mtv.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1502 Lines: 45 On Wed, Jan 06 2010, Divyesh Shah wrote: > In cfq_should_preempt(), we currently allow some cases where a non-RT request > can preempt an ongoing RT cfqq timeslice. This should not happen. > Examples include: > > o A sync_noidle wl type non-RT request pre-empting a sync_noidle wl type cfqq > on which we are idling. > o Once we have per-cgroup async queues, a non-RT sync request pre-empting a RT > async cfqq. > > Signed-off-by: Divyesh Shah > --- > > block/cfq-iosched.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c > index 7d6cef9..e9e6610 100644 > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c > +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c > @@ -3104,6 +3104,12 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq, > return true; > > /* > + * Don't allow a non-RT request to preempt an ongoing RT cfqq timeslice. > + */ > + if (cfq_class_rt(cfqq) && !cfq_class_rt(new_cfqq)) > + return false; It would be nice to just be able to do if (new_cfqq->ioprio_class > cfqq->ioprio_class) return false; but that doesn't quite work given IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE < _RT. So I think your patch is fine, I've added it. Thanks. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/