Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 22:00:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 22:00:06 -0400 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:34702 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 22:00:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:59:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: Neil Brown cc: Keith Owens , Subject: Re: 2.5.7 Rules.make change break nfsd. In-Reply-To: <15533.19747.471321.592478@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Neil Brown wrote: > If the basename of some object is "export" (i.e. export.o), then the > underlined section referes to "export-objs" which is a macro that > already has a well defined meaning. > > Maybe it should be "-Objs" or "-components" or ... Hmmh, I did that change. Changing the -objs suffix is not really an option, as it's being used all over the makefiles already. But you're right, this conflict needs to be resolved. (It also means nobody can build a multi-part object called export.o, but I suppose that's a limitation we can live with it.) I think I'll just filter out export.o at the affected places. --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/