Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:32:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:32:12 -0500 Received: from mailhost.talkware.net ([216.5.131.131]:25094 "EHLO mailhost.talkware.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:31:52 -0500 Message-ID: <3A3024D4.EDA13485@talkware.net> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 18:01:24 -0600 From: Eric Estabrooks X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: cyrix III by via Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am not a subscriber to this list, but I thought this was important information (which you might already have). The cyrixIII chips by via have the centaur vendor id which causes the identify_cpu call in arch/i386/kernel/setup.c to fail. It is probably reasonable for it to have the centaur id as via owns centaur as well. I just replaced the centaur_model call with the cyrix_model one, but I know that I am using a cyrix chip. A test probably needs to be added in the centaur_model section to test for the cyrixIII in disguise. The error is a general protection fault. Sorry if this is old hat, Eric Estabrooks estabroo@talkware.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/