Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:11:36 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
       David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node
Message-Id: <20100111141136.0ee352b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100106045509.245662398@samba.org>
References: <20100106045509.245662398@samba.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 690
Lines: 17

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:55:09 +1100
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote:

> A number of places in the kernel use cpumask_of_node(-1), but most arch
> NUMA implementations are broken. The following patches fix this.
> 

So..  what's happening here?  Nobody has applied the patches anywhere,
you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with
CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport
was mentioned.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/