Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:04:50 +1100
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
       David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node
Message-ID: <20100112020450.GD12666@kryten>
References: <20100106045509.245662398@samba.org>
 <20100111141136.0ee352b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100111141136.0ee352b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 561
Lines: 16


Hi,

> So..  what's happening here?  Nobody has applied the patches anywhere,
> you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with
> CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport
> was mentioned.

Just checked and it's already upstream on ia64. That just leaves alpha.

Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/