Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:09:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:09:55 -0400 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([195.39.74.230]:35799 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:09:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:09:29 +0200 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Helge Hafting Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux as a minicomputer ? Message-ID: <20020412100929.B17963@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20020411170910.GS612@gallifrey> <20020411191339.B15435@ucw.cz> <20020411174941.GC17962@antefacto.com> <20020411.195921.730560311.rene.rebe@gmx.net> <20020411210606.A15783@ucw.cz> <3CB68FA6.F2DACB93@aitel.hist.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 09:41:26AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > It IS the kernel's fault, because only one VT can be active. The > > > kernel VT stuff needs to be redesigned to hadle multiple VT at the > > > same time ... > > > > Yes and no. You shouldn't need VTs to run Xservers at all. > > Still a kernel problem, what if all the users want to run > vgacon/fbcon instead of X? One VT per physical interface > is what we need, rather than "per machine". Yes. James Simmons has this work almost done. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/