Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:17:24 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Scott Smedley <ss@aao.gov.au>
Cc: Marin Mitov <mitov@issp.bas.bg>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Yet another dt3155 driver for drivers/staging
Message-ID: <20100113001724.GB29904@kroah.com>
References: <201001122242.22774.mitov@issp.bas.bg>
 <20100112235221.GA20761@aao.gov.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100112235221.GA20761@aao.gov.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1053
Lines: 33

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:52:21AM +1100, Scott Smedley wrote:
> Hi Marin,
> 
> > dt3155 frame grabber I am using in my experiments since 
> > the time of 2.6.17 kernel.
> 
> Whoah!
> 
> > I will really appreciate your comments, suggestions, criticism.
> 
> I haven't tried your driver but the code looks much neater than
> our driver. Still, I am wondering why you chose to implement a
> device driver from scratch, rather than use an existing one?
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/dt3155a/
> 
> I'll leave decisions about whether to merge or discard (either
> driver) to Greg. My 2 cents is that there should only be 1 DT3155
> driver for users to choose from.

I agree, we only need one of them.

Scott, any comparison between the two of them as to which one actually
works better?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/