Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755076Ab0AMIX0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:23:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754991Ab0AMIX0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:23:26 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:58472 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755047Ab0AMIXZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:23:25 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,316,1257148800"; d="scan'208";a="232171965" Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:23:22 +0800 From: Shaohua Li To: Corrado Zoccolo Cc: "jens.axboe@oracle.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "jmoyer@redhat.com" , "vgoyal@redhat.com" , "guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com" , "yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH]cfq-iosched: don't stop async queue with async requests pending Message-ID: <20100113082322.GA24345@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> References: <20100113074442.GA10492@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <4e5e476b1001130018n2ad9e830s4a20d922abd4c7bb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4e5e476b1001130018n2ad9e830s4a20d922abd4c7bb@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1166 Lines: 23 On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 04:18:47PM +0800, Corrado Zoccolo wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Shaohua Li wrote: > > My SSD speed of direct write is about 80m/s, while I test page writeback, > > the speed can only go to 68m/s. Below patch fixes this. > > It appears we missused cfq_should_idle in cfq_may_dispatch. cfq_should_idle > > means a queue should idle because it's seekless sync queue or it's the last queue, > > which is to maintain service tree time slice. So it doesn't mean the > > last queue is always a sync queue. If the last queue is asyn queue, > > we definitely shouldn't stop dispatch requests because of pending async > > requests. > > An other option is that cfq_should_idle returns false for async > queues, since cfq will never idle on them. I'm considering this option too, but it appears we need make async queue idle to maintain domain time slice. Thanks, Shaohua -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/