Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755089Ab0AMJq5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:46:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752442Ab0AMJq5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:46:57 -0500 Received: from ms01.sssup.it ([193.205.80.99]:35330 "EHLO sssup.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751902Ab0AMJq4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:46:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC 10/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: group bandwidth management code From: Raistlin To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel , michael trimarchi , Fabio Checconi , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Dhaval Giani , Johan Eker , "p.faure" , Chris Friesen , Steven Rostedt , Henrik Austad , Frederic Weisbecker , Darren Hart , Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , Claudio Scordino , Tommaso Cucinotta , "giuseppe.lipari" , Juri Lelli In-Reply-To: <1262011872.7135.119.camel@laptop> References: <1255707324.6228.448.camel@Palantir> <1255708004.6228.466.camel@Palantir> <1262011872.7135.119.camel@laptop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Y28LBuYjTxJY9WKQHE+q" Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:46:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1263376014.3853.20.camel@Palantir> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1977 Lines: 60 --=-Y28LBuYjTxJY9WKQHE+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 15:51 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:46 +0200, Raistlin wrote: > > CPU Container Groups support for SCHED_DEADLINE is introduced by this c= ommit. > >=20 > > CGroups, if configured, have a SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth, and it is enfo= rced > > that the sum of the bandwidths of entities (tasks and groups) belonging= to > > a group stays below its own bandwidth. >=20 > No real comment on the code here, but since we have a deadline bandwidth > reservation, should we not also couple to the existing rt (fifo) > bandwidth reservation? >=20 > We can't after all guarantee the FIFO time if there's deadline > reservations around for more. >=20 Mmm... If I'm getting this right, you're suggesting to decrease from the available system rt-bandwidth the bandwidth devoted to deadline scheduling. This make more than sense to me... I'll think about how to make the code reflect that. Thanks and regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa (Italy) http://blog.linux.it/raistlin / raistlin@ekiga.net / dario.faggioli@jabber.org --=-Y28LBuYjTxJY9WKQHE+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAktNlo0ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSnkACfZDM3BfhnDOHElROFgQZUQJQV kq4AoJDTC0tY2CHRZPQCEuGefRO6kEQQ =0Tsg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Y28LBuYjTxJY9WKQHE+q-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/