Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932136Ab0AMPHH (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:07:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755765Ab0AMPHG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:07:06 -0500 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:43949 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755739Ab0AMPHF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:07:05 -0500 From: Krzysztof Halasa To: Herbert Xu Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Crypto test results unused? References: <20100112111439.GA31504@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100112224404.GA5480@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:07:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20100112224404.GA5480@gondor.apana.org.au> (Herbert Xu's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:44:05 +1100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 614 Lines: 16 Herbert Xu writes: >> I think we need a way to differentiate between "really unknown" and >> "failed", do we need another flag for it? > > It doesn't matter. We test all algorithms at registration time. > So unknown means failed except during registration. So should we change "selftest: unknown" to "failed" then? -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/